Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sketchy /rough results on GT poses #100

Open
OiOchai opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Sketchy /rough results on GT poses #100

OiOchai opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@OiOchai
Copy link

OiOchai commented Mar 15, 2024

Hey,

I'm having a weird issue that the results trained on GT camera poses are a lot worse than colmap-estimated ones. Basically, the results with GT poses are rougher/more sketchy than using the colmap pose. The context here is just for static scene, basically for all the dynamic method mentioned here I just train only single frame.

From GT pose:
image
From colmap-estimated pose:
image

To clarify, I still put the GT poses in colmap and follow here to get the pointcloud, and this GT pose and pointcloud works well (and even better than colmap-estimated ones) with:

  1. NeRF/nerfstudio
  2. Dynamic3DGaussians

It works same bad with:

  1. 3DGS original implementation
  2. 4DGaussians

I suspect that something is wrong in camera conversion because both the original 3DGS and your implementation uses the same camera class https://github.com/hustvl/4DGaussians/blob/master/scene/cameras.py#L17. But honestly my cameras are so simple, just pinhole cameras. I cannot think of anywhere could go wrong. Curious to know your thoughts on this! Thank you very much!

@guanjunwu
Copy link
Collaborator

guanjunwu commented Mar 20, 2024

Can you provide the dataset link to me and let me try it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants