Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Follow-up paper ideas #50

Open
13 tasks
hippke opened this issue Jan 31, 2019 · 1 comment
Open
13 tasks

Follow-up paper ideas #50

hippke opened this issue Jan 31, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@hippke
Copy link
Owner

hippke commented Jan 31, 2019

Searches

  • K2 multiples
  • Paper: Quad system
  • Paper: New multis
  • K2 full
  • K2 multiples
  • K1 full
  • TESS

Theory

  • Determine effect of TTVs on SDE:
  • Is a TTV-smeared transit more transit-like (or more box-like)?
  • Are very short transits (outside of Figure 5) detectable?
  • See previous estimates about exoplanet detectability around White Dwarfs (Agol 2011) and other exotic places (Imara & Stefano 2017).
  • If this is realistic, how should TLS be adapted?
  • Simply change the shortest transit duration to 1 cadence?
  • How big is the morphological shape deformation with "long" cadences?
  • Is the best transit template V-shaped?
  • Account for TTVs
  • For BLS this has been implemeneted: Quasiperiodic Automated Transit Search (Carter & Agol 2012)
  • Is this computationally realistic fo TLS? The major additional effort should be non-constant phase folding?
  • Determine detection biases:
  • Observational biases for transiting planets (Kipping & Sandford 2016) are partly due to the box shaped transit fit (when using BLS).
  • Even when fitting a better transit shape like the TLS template, similar biases can be expected since our template curve cannot be a perfect fit for all transits.
  • For example, an eccentric or V-form grazing transit shape is substantially different from a box.
  • This causes increased noise, resulting in lower detection efficiency.
  • A few real, but rare, transit shapes might be closer to a box than to the reference transit template, resulting in a different set of observational biases.
  • Characterizing these can be a natural follow-up work.
  • Benchmark machine-learning vs. TLS:
  • Speed
  • Detection efficiency
  • Develop a heuristic of a shallowest transit depth to be fitted, as a function of noise in the data, period, and other factors.
  • What is the optimal (most sparse but still accurate) period grid to re-calculate the transit shape to correct for morphological deformations
  • PLATOsim
@hippke hippke added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 31, 2019
@reneheller
Copy link

– René to request 3 years of DFG funding for a PhD student to investigate detrending methods (see my e-mail for proposal sketch)
– as for "TTV-smeared transit": I suspect a running median filter will transform it into a (more or less) un-smeared transit
– maybe instead of / in addition to PLATOSim we could use the ready-to-use & publicly available PLATO Solar-like Light-curve Simulator (PSLS, https://sites.lesia.obspm.fr/psls) to generate realistic PLATO light curves with transits

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants