Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DPSLN-5] The SimpleLocalnet backend should take (RemoteTable -> RemoteTable) rather than RemoteTable #10

Open
qnikst opened this issue Jun 17, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@qnikst
Copy link
Contributor

qnikst commented Jun 17, 2015

[Imported from JIRA. Reported by Edsko de Vries @edsko) as DPSLN-5 on 2012-10-22 14:12:04]
This avoids the need for Control.Distributed.Process.Node in applications that use it.

@qnikst qnikst changed the title The SimpleLocalnet backend should take (RemoteTable -> RemoteTable) rather than RemoteTable [DPSLN-5] The SimpleLocalnet backend should take (RemoteTable -> RemoteTable) rather than RemoteTable Jun 18, 2015
@qnikst qnikst mentioned this issue Dec 29, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant