Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Harmony economic model is not clearly reflected in the code #4223

Open
dannyposi opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Harmony economic model is not clearly reflected in the code #4223

dannyposi opened this issue Jul 6, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
design Design and architectural plans/issues

Comments

@dannyposi
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Harmony economic model is described here: https://medium.com/harmony-one/harmonys-new-tokenomics-bcdac0db60d7
It says:

- Constant annual reward of 441M ONE regardless of changes in underlying variables such as block time and staking ratio
- Transaction fees offset issuance creating a path to 0 issuance as protocol gains adoption.

As I understand, the number of tokens issuanced will decrease to zero as the transaction volume increases. But i cannot find this logic (decrease tokens issuanced to zero) in the code.

Current Design

Currently the rewards always calculated by defaultReward*votePercent (defaultReward is 7 ONE and votePercent is hardcoded for corresponding node's instance). (See logic:

due := defaultReward.Mul(
)

Problems

Logic not reflected in the code.

Proposal

None

@dannyposi dannyposi added the design Design and architectural plans/issues label Jul 6, 2022
@harmony-one harmony-one deleted a comment from Heaterdevx Sep 5, 2022
@sophoah
Copy link
Contributor

sophoah commented Sep 5, 2022

the token economics will have to be updated once the R1 proposal is implemented. Right now, the logic is in the transaction fees that are currently burnt and not redistributed to any parties. However that will change in the future. cc @rlan35

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
design Design and architectural plans/issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants
@sophoah @dannyposi and others