Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check if atom-elmjutsu can use a tree sitter for code highlighting #165

Open
razzeee opened this issue Apr 10, 2019 · 8 comments
Open

Check if atom-elmjutsu can use a tree sitter for code highlighting #165

razzeee opened this issue Apr 10, 2019 · 8 comments

Comments

@razzeee
Copy link

razzeee commented Apr 10, 2019

See https://github.com/Razzeee/tree-sitter-elm for my implementation, I believe, that we would still need a css file for the colors like here for python https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-python/blob/master/properties/highlights.css

It should hopefully improve code highlighting with broken syntax

@halohalospecial
Copy link
Owner

Looks cool! How do we use that?

@razzeee
Copy link
Author

razzeee commented May 21, 2019

I have no idea, will hopefully be back with some more info later.

(btw in the longrun it might make sense to also rely on the language server I'm writing)

@razzeee
Copy link
Author

razzeee commented May 22, 2019

@halohalospecial
Copy link
Owner

@razzeee
Copy link
Author

razzeee commented May 23, 2019

@Arcanemagus
Copy link

Btw the link above https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-python/blob/master/properties/highlights.css is not relevant at all

That link is relevant for creating a language package for Atom, but not relevant for the Tree-sitter grammar itself 😉.

@razzeee
Copy link
Author

razzeee commented May 30, 2019

According to the author it's not (yet) relevant https://twitter.com/maxbrunsfeld/status/1131339401189965825

@razzeee
Copy link
Author

razzeee commented Oct 16, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants