Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

many inequivalent sites, all w/the same description #11

Open
computron opened this issue Dec 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Open

many inequivalent sites, all w/the same description #11

computron opened this issue Dec 19, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@computron
Copy link
Contributor

the description is a bit clunky when sites are symmetrically inequivalent, but have the same description nevertheless

(py37) computron-7:~ ajain$ robocrys mp-7631

SiC is Moissanite-6H structured and crystallizes in the hexagonal P6_3mc space group. The structure is three-dimensional. there are three inequivalent Si4+ sites. In the first Si4+ site, Si(1)4+ is bonded to one C(2)4- and three equivalent C(1)4- atoms to form corner-sharing SiC4 tetrahedra. The Si(1)–C(2) bond length is 1.90 Å. All Si(1)–C(1) bond lengths are 1.89 Å. In the second Si4+ site, Si(2)4+ is bonded to one C(3)4- and three equivalent C(2)4- atoms to form corner-sharing SiC4 tetrahedra. The Si(2)–C(3) bond length is 1.90 Å. All Si(2)–C(2) bond lengths are 1.89 Å. In the third Si4+ site, Si(3)4+ is bonded to one C(1)4- and three equivalent C(3)4- atoms to form corner-sharing SiC4 tetrahedra. The Si(3)–C(1) bond length is 1.90 Å. All Si(3)–C(3) bond lengths are 1.90 Å. There are three inequivalent C4- sites. In the first C4- site, C(1)4- is bonded to one Si(3)4+ and three equivalent Si(1)4+ atoms to form corner-sharing CSi4 tetrahedra. In the second C4- site, C(2)4- is bonded to one Si(1)4+ and three equivalent Si(2)4+ atoms to form corner-sharing CSi4 tetrahedra. In the third C4- site, C(3)4- is bonded to one Si(2)4+ and three equivalent Si(3)4+ atoms to form corner-sharing CSi4 tetrahedra.

@utf
Copy link
Member

utf commented Dec 19, 2018

This is another case where a --group-similar-sites would be beneficial.

@computron
Copy link
Contributor Author

Probably have that be on by default then? Not sure if I was the one that told you not to do this, but if so, ignore past me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants