Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support plan AtomicLong, IgniteSet with thin client? #2308

Open
pkgonan opened this issue Feb 3, 2022 · 8 comments
Open

Support plan AtomicLong, IgniteSet with thin client? #2308

pkgonan opened this issue Feb 3, 2022 · 8 comments

Comments

@pkgonan
Copy link

pkgonan commented Feb 3, 2022

Hi. Is there any support plan AtomicLong, IgniteSet with thin client? @ptupitsyn

@ptupitsyn
Copy link
Contributor

ptupitsyn commented Feb 4, 2022 via email

@pkgonan
Copy link
Author

pkgonan commented Feb 4, 2022

@ptupitsyn
Thank you for your reply.
Is there an expected release version or date? Jira issue url are fine too.

@pkgonan
Copy link
Author

pkgonan commented Mar 11, 2022

@ptupitsyn

you can wrap AtomicLong or IgniteSet inside a Service and call it from the thin client.

Do you have any code or sample that I can refer to?

@ptupitsyn
Copy link
Contributor

@pkgonan here is an example with AtomicLong wrapped in a Service and used from thin client:

https://gist.github.com/ptupitsyn/e3e23845b0bc4de45403c7bcc7c704ae

@pkgonan
Copy link
Author

pkgonan commented Mar 11, 2022

@ptupitsyn Thank you very much :) I will try it using java language.

@ptupitsyn
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, should be straightforward to translate to Java. When people ping me I assume it is about .NET :)

@pkgonan
Copy link
Author

pkgonan commented Mar 11, 2022

@ptupitsyn
Thick Client is too heavy, so there will be many users who want to use Thin Client, but the inability to use AtomicLong and IgniteSet seems to be a big disadvantage. If users want to use AtomicLong and IgniteSet as a thin client, I think it is inconvenient to create a Jar file to wrap it with a ignite service feature.

The usability is not good, so I am thinking about whether I should use Redis.

Will I be able to use AtomicLong and IgniteSet directly in Java Thin Client in the near future? It is too bad usability from the point of view of paid users to wrap it as a ignite service feature and use it.

@ptupitsyn
Copy link
Contributor

paid users

If you are a GridGain customer, please contact the support team at https://www.gridgain.com/services/support

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants