Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

To use Boost.Graph Library, or to stay the status quo? #20

Open
godai0519 opened this issue Jan 4, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

To use Boost.Graph Library, or to stay the status quo? #20

godai0519 opened this issue Jan 4, 2016 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement help wanted question

Comments

@godai0519
Copy link
Owner

If BayesianNetwork use Boost.Graph Library(BGL), it's nesessary to rewrite from the beginning. But, we can use various libraries and functions, that implmented by BGL. For example, shortest path, max flow, and more!

On the other hand, if BayesianNetwork stay, it is added many comment and encourage a few modification.

Umm, what should I do?
I'll think about it for a while.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement help wanted question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@godai0519