Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What's new in grav 2 #1643

Closed
niahoo opened this issue Sep 8, 2017 · 10 comments
Closed

What's new in grav 2 #1643

niahoo opened this issue Sep 8, 2017 · 10 comments

Comments

@niahoo
Copy link

niahoo commented Sep 8, 2017

So I can see that you are wworking on a version 2.0. Is there any place that I could see a roadmap or a list of intended features ?

I'm starting to build a project right now and I want to get exciting news :)

Cheers.

@rhukster
Copy link
Member

I was just discussing this with @mahagr last week. We were discussing scope and a plan of attack for 2.0. We're still working on these discussions, so as soon as we have a solid outline of what 2.0 will entail, and our plan for continuing to improve on 2.0, we'll document it in the form of a blog post at least, and perhaps in the docs too.

@niahoo
Copy link
Author

niahoo commented Sep 11, 2017

Great :)

@drnasin
Copy link
Contributor

drnasin commented Nov 16, 2017

Guys, do you need any more hands on 2.0? Willing to help if needed... @rhukster

@mahagr
Copy link
Member

mahagr commented Nov 23, 2017

More hands are always welcome if you have ideas for improvements.

So far most of the 2.0 branch does is to add some new base classes which can be used in Grav and plugins -- the classes are used in some private projects, but I still need to find time to implement them in Grav itself.

@drnasin
Copy link
Contributor

drnasin commented Nov 27, 2017

can you tell me what was the idea behind 2.0?Some new major workflow improvements? New features?

@mahagr
Copy link
Member

mahagr commented Nov 27, 2017

There's really no idea in the branch, it's just a bunch of classes which aren't used or not ready to be included in the current version of Grav.

@rhukster
Copy link
Member

This is something we need to get a better handle on. We've been so busy lately that we've not had much chance to really nail down what we want for 2.0. Or at least it's been a bit fluid, and we still need to nail it down. We'll discuss this as a team and post something.

@drnasin
Copy link
Contributor

drnasin commented Nov 28, 2017

I understand @rhukster. What I would do (but that's just me) is to allow advanced users and "average joe" (but longtime) users to chip in with their ideas for improvements.

@rhukster
Copy link
Member

#1767

@niahoo
Copy link
Author

niahoo commented Nov 29, 2017

Great, thank you :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants