Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ENH: Make identity and union faster by using already calculated intersection as erase layer #428

Open
theroggy opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #525
Open

ENH: Make identity and union faster by using already calculated intersection as erase layer #428

theroggy opened this issue Nov 13, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #525
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@theroggy
Copy link
Collaborator

This is faster, but more tests are needed to make sure this doesn't lead to more topology errors, both with and without gridsize.
@theroggy theroggy added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 25, 2023
@theroggy theroggy changed the title Make identity and union faster by using already calculated intersection as erase layer ENH: Make identity and union faster by using already calculated intersection as erase layer May 8, 2024
@theroggy theroggy linked a pull request May 8, 2024 that will close this issue
Draft
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

ENH: Improve performance of identity and union by using intersection to erase theroggy/geofileops
1 participant
@theroggy