Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Handling of metadata within the SafeMaskMaker #5226

Open
bkhelifi opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Handling of metadata within the SafeMaskMaker #5226

bkhelifi opened this issue Apr 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
effort-low
Milestone
1.3

Comments

@bkhelifi
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@bkhelifi bkhelifi added this to the 1.3 milestone Apr 19, 2024
@AtreyeeS
Copy link
Member

AtreyeeS commented May 2, 2024

What is the intended action here? The SafeMaskMaker options should be added to the MapDatasetMetaData (eg: the offset cut etc)? Currently the MapDatasetMetaData container does not have room for this, and maintaining it can get quite complex no?

@bkhelifi
Copy link
Member Author

bkhelifi commented May 2, 2024

The options are maybe rather be stored into Provenance.
But as you can see in the code, it handles already data from the meta dictionary.... So, one needs 1. always use the metadata classes 2. decide whether the current handling is wise 3. aob needed for the dataflow of metadata

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
effort-low
Projects
Propagation of metadata within the 3Danalysis data reduction
Status: No status
Milestone
1.3
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bkhelifi @AtreyeeS