Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider supporting multiple versions of metadata #37

Open
tpetricek opened this issue Nov 25, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

Consider supporting multiple versions of metadata #37

tpetricek opened this issue Nov 25, 2015 · 5 comments

Comments

@tpetricek
Copy link
Member

... when inserting a new version of a snippet. Currently, we just overwrite the old ones.

@kunjee17
Copy link
Contributor

kunjee17 commented Mar 5, 2016

@tpetricek what is status of #44 ? Because we can use default functionality database to version system for documents(snippets.).

Like storing things as events (JSON) for every edit. So, that way it will be inline with out current structure.

@tpetricek
Copy link
Member Author

I would ideally like to be able to store things in simple blob storage as one alternative. But we could definitely store edits as events, that sounds sensible no matter how we store it!

@kunjee17
Copy link
Contributor

kunjee17 commented Mar 5, 2016

@tpetricek so, we can try one thing. We don't change current storing scenario but try changing what we are storing (or way we are storing) and store metadata with the data. Sounds good?

@kunjee17
Copy link
Contributor

@tpetricek I m little bit tied up with some other project of mine. So, may be can't give more time to this. I will try to get back this as soon as I got some time. Else have to open up for others to grab.

Sorry :(.

@Thorium
Copy link
Contributor

Thorium commented Jun 20, 2017

Currently when updating it seems that:

  1. It keeps the author as previous version.
  2. It resets the likes to zero.
  3. The timestamp resets to current date.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants