Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

why is testing image-size different from training #57

Open
RuibinMa opened this issue Nov 7, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

why is testing image-size different from training #57

RuibinMa opened this issue Nov 7, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@RuibinMa
Copy link

RuibinMa commented Nov 7, 2019

Thanks for sharing the code first! I'm wondering why in the test script you used 1024 as image size and multiscale but in train script you used 362 and no multiscale. Could you give some insights on that?

In general, do you recommend always using the 1024 + multiscale setting in practice?

@filipradenovic
Copy link
Owner

In general, for inference, 1024 performs the best, and multi-scale helps. However, for training, the benefits of larger scale diminish. You can run training with 1024, and get some small benefit, but at a very high cost of GPU memory and training time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants