Error when checking erc20 balance

[arvin-lau]

Checklist

• This is not a security-related bug/issue. If it is, please follow please follow the security policy.
• I have searched on the issue tracker and the lotus forum, and there is no existing related issue or discussion.
• I did not make any code changes to lotus.

Lotus component

• lotus Ethereum RPC
• lotus FVM - Lotus FVM interactions
• FEVM tooling
• Other

Lotus Version

Daemon:  1.25.2+mainnet+git.60a61b483.dirty+api1.5.0
Local: lotus version 1.25.2+mainnet+git.60a61b483.dirty

Repro Steps

package main

import (
	"context"
	"fmt"
	"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum"
	"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/accounts/abi"
	"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/common"
	"github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/ethclient"
	"log"
	"strings"
)

const Erc20AbiJson = "[{\"constant\":true,\"inputs\":[],\"name\":\"name\",\"outputs\":[{\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"string\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"view\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"name\":\"spender\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"name\":\"tokens\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"approve\",\"outputs\":[{\"name\":\"success\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":true,\"inputs\":[],\"name\":\"totalSupply\",\"outputs\":[{\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"view\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"name\":\"from\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"name\":\"to\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"name\":\"tokens\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"transferFrom\",\"outputs\":[{\"name\":\"success\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":true,\"inputs\":[],\"name\":\"decimals\",\"outputs\":[{\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"uint8\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"view\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":true,\"inputs\":[{\"name\":\"tokenOwner\",\"type\":\"address\"}],\"name\":\"balanceOf\",\"outputs\":[{\"name\":\"balance\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"view\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":true,\"inputs\":[],\"name\":\"symbol\",\"outputs\":[{\"name\":\"\",\"type\":\"string\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"view\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"name\":\"to\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"name\":\"tokens\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"transfer\",\"outputs\":[{\"name\":\"success\",\"type\":\"bool\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"nonpayable\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"constant\":true,\"inputs\":[{\"name\":\"tokenOwner\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"name\":\"spender\",\"type\":\"address\"}],\"name\":\"allowance\",\"outputs\":[{\"name\":\"remaining\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"payable\":false,\"stateMutability\":\"view\",\"type\":\"function\"},{\"anonymous\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"indexed\":true,\"name\":\"from\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":true,\"name\":\"to\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":false,\"name\":\"tokens\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"Transfer\",\"type\":\"event\"},{\"anonymous\":false,\"inputs\":[{\"indexed\":true,\"name\":\"tokenOwner\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":true,\"name\":\"spender\",\"type\":\"address\"},{\"indexed\":false,\"name\":\"tokens\",\"type\":\"uint256\"}],\"name\":\"Approval\",\"type\":\"event\"}]"

func main() {
	client, err := ethclient.Dial("ws://127.0.0.1:1182/rpc/v1")
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	erc20ContractAbi, err := abi.JSON(strings.NewReader(Erc20AbiJson))
	if err != nil {
		fmt.Println("ERROR: abi.JSON(strings.NewReader(Erc20AbiJson)) err:", err)
		return
	}

	input, err := erc20ContractAbi.Pack(
		"balanceOf",
		common.HexToAddress("0x6AE8ec1968Ce69DC18c64f6AC999a0DE40023a8F"),
	)
	if err != nil {
		log.Println("ERROR: contractAbi.Pack err:", err)
		return
	}
	tokenAddressHash := common.HexToAddress("0x2421db204968A367CC2C866CD057fA754Cb84EdF")
	msg := ethereum.CallMsg{
		To:    &tokenAddressHash,
		Value: nil,
		Data:  input,
	}
	out, err := client.CallContract(context.TODO(), msg, nil)
	if err != nil {
		log.Println("ERROR: evmClient.CallContract err:", err)
		return
	}
	fmt.Println("out: ", out)
}

Describe the Bug

An error occurred while checking the erc20 balance

2024/03/16 17:35:38 ERROR: evmClient.CallContract err: message execution failed: exit 33, revert reason: none, vm error: message failed with backtrace:
00: f02067808 (method 3844450837) -- contract reverted (33)
 (RetCode=33)

Can anyone tell me how to fix this?

Tooling

Ethereum dependencies used github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum v1.13.14

Did not use third-party nodes, self-built nodes

Configuration Options

[Fevm]
  # EnableEthRPC enables eth_ rpc, and enables storing a mapping of eth transaction hashes to filecoin message Cids.
  # This will also enable the RealTimeFilterAPI and HistoricFilterAPI by default, but they can be disabled by config options above.
  #
  # type: bool
  # env var: LOTUS_FEVM_ENABLEETHRPC
  EnableEthRPC = true

  # EthTxHashMappingLifetimeDays the transaction hash lookup database will delete mappings that have been stored for more than x days
  # Set to 0 to keep all mappings
  #
  # type: int
  # env var: LOTUS_FEVM_ETHTXHASHMAPPINGLIFETIMEDAYS
  #EthTxHashMappingLifetimeDays = 0

  [Fevm.Events]
    # EnableEthRPC enables APIs that
    # DisableRealTimeFilterAPI will disable the RealTimeFilterAPI that can create and query filters for actor events as they are emitted.
    # The API is enabled when EnableEthRPC is true, but can be disabled selectively with this flag.
    #
    # type: bool
    # env var: LOTUS_FEVM_EVENTS_DISABLEREALTIMEFILTERAPI
    #DisableRealTimeFilterAPI = false

    # DisableHistoricFilterAPI will disable the HistoricFilterAPI that can create and query filters for actor events
    # that occurred in the past. HistoricFilterAPI maintains a queryable index of events.
    # The API is enabled when EnableEthRPC is true, but can be disabled selectively with this flag.
    #
    # type: bool
    # env var: LOTUS_FEVM_EVENTS_DISABLEHISTORICFILTERAPI
    #DisableHistoricFilterAPI = false

    # FilterTTL specifies the time to live for actor event filters. Filters that haven't been accessed longer than
    # this time become eligible for automatic deletion.
    #
    # type: Duration
    # env var: LOTUS_FEVM_EVENTS_FILTERTTL
    #FilterTTL = "24h0m0s"

    # MaxFilters specifies the maximum number of filters that may exist at any one time.
    #
    # type: int
    # env var: LOTUS_FEVM_EVENTS_MAXFILTERS
    #MaxFilters = 100

    # MaxFilterResults specifies the maximum number of results that can be accumulated by an actor event filter.
    #
    # type: int
    # env var: LOTUS_FEVM_EVENTS_MAXFILTERRESULTS
    #MaxFilterResults = 10000

    # MaxFilterHeightRange specifies the maximum range of heights that can be used in a filter (to avoid querying
    # the entire chain)
    #
    # type: uint64
    # env var: LOTUS_FEVM_EVENTS_MAXFILTERHEIGHTRANGE
    #MaxFilterHeightRange = 2880

    # DatabasePath is the full path to a sqlite database that will be used to index actor events to
    # support the historic filter APIs. If the database does not exist it will be created. The directory containing
    # the database must already exist and be writeable. If a relative path is provided here, sqlite treats it as
    # relative to the CWD (current working directory).
    #
    # type: string
    # env var: LOTUS_FEVM_EVENTS_DATABASEPATH
    #DatabasePath = ""


[Index]
  # EXPERIMENTAL FEATURE. USE WITH CAUTION
  # EnableMsgIndex enables indexing of messages on chain.
  #
  # type: bool
  # env var: LOTUS_INDEX_ENABLEMSGINDEX
  #EnableMsgIndex = false

[arvin-lau]

Can anyone answer my question?

[arvin-lau]

I'm wondering if fevm is only compatible with jsonRpc calls and not with calls using go-ethereum? I use the same code to call other evm chains and it works fine, only fevm reports errors, can the community answer me this question?

[polus-arcticus]

hey, i ran into the same issue as well https://github.com/polus-arcticus/go-ethereum-fevm-test

https://filecoinproject.slack.com/archives/C06GC2A63JS/p1715844990146779 is what i'm hoping on.
theory is filecoin-project/FIPs#962 perhaps go-ethereum isn't generating go-bindings in the appropriate format for the tendermint apis since filecoin only supports 1559 and not older versions. I mean geth is quite a bit older, so perhaps it defaulted to old styles txs, i havent checked ,but just a theory

[jennijuju]

Jfyi we are hoping to add support to older versions in filecoin https://github.com/filecoin-project/FIPs/blob/master/FIPS/fip-0091.md - fip is in last call would love some support if you wanna see it happen! We have an implementation ready and tested too

[polus-arcticus]

Jfyi we are hoping to add support to older versions in filecoin https://github.com/filecoin-project/FIPs/blob/master/FIPS/fip-0091.md - fip is in last call would love some support if you wanna see it happen! We have an implementation ready and tested too

indeed! from FIP

To ensure compatibility with Filecoin's signature verification, which only recognizes V values of 0 or 1 (as is also the case with the current signature verification implementation in go-ethereum), adjustments will be made to the V parameter in legacy transactions before verifying their signatures. Specifically, for Homestead transactions, 27 will be subtracted from the V parameter. For EIP-155 transactions, the adjustment will involve subtracting (2*ChainID + 35) from the V parameter

What can I do to show support? this is blocking our project from moving onto the ipc and fevm ecosystems

[jennijuju]

Help us review the FIP draft to see it gives you wants needed & a comment in fip discussion on how that can help you would be great!

Glad to know it can be useful for you!

[aarshkshah1992]

Hey @polus-arcticus @arvin-lau

As Jenn mentioned above, we're planning to enable support for legacy ETH transactions in Filecoin as part of FIP-0091(https://github.com/filecoin-project/FIPs/blob/master/FIPS/fip-0091.md). The following PR for that is already code complete and reviewed:

filecoin-project/lotus#11969

Please feel free to leave your comments/thoughts on the FIP and/or PR and let me know if you have any concerns. You can also try out the PR with a custom Lotus build if you are using your own Lotus instance for testing/deploying these contracts.