Add JSDoc Support

[mikicho]

Prerequisites

• I have written a descriptive issue title
• I have searched existing issues to ensure the feature has not already been requested

🚀 Feature Proposal

Unfortunately, Typescript doesn't support inline generics with JSDoc, yet. microsoft/TypeScript#27387
But AFAIK, there should be no difference between JSDoc and Typescript on this matter.
I tried to make it work without the need to override the type again and again but failed.
I'm not a Typescript expert, so I would appreciate it if someone could take a look.

Motivation

Use Typebox provider in JS + JSDoc projects (typescript only as a type checker without compiling the code)

Example

No response

[Eomm]

It seems interesting, would you mind opening a PR with your code?

[mikicho]

@Eomm Thanks. Unfortunately, I couldn't make it work. I'd be glad to create an example project if needed.

[NemoStein]

This is the way forward!!

typescript only as a type checker without compiling the code

I'd love to see fastify play nicely with TS typings in JS too...

[tinchoz49]

Hey guys, you can do this:

It should autocomplete the params and also can validate the types if you define a jsconfig.json with checkJs=true

/** @typedef {import('@fastify/type-provider-typebox').TypeBoxTypeProvider} TypeBoxTypeProvider */

import createFastify from 'fastify'
import { TypeBoxValidatorCompiler } from '@fastify/type-provider-typebox'
import { Type } from '@sinclair/typebox'

const fastify = createFastify()

/** @type {ReturnType<typeof fastify.withTypeProvider<TypeBoxTypeProvider>>} */
const api = fastify
  .setValidatorCompiler(TypeBoxValidatorCompiler)
  .withTypeProvider()

api.get('/', {
  schema: {
    querystring: Type.Object({
      x: Type.String(),
      y: Type.String(),
      z: Type.String()
    })
  }
}, (req) => {
  const { x } = req.query
})

[mcollina]

Wow!