Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

EIPIP Meeting 102 #326

Open
15 of 16 tasks
poojaranjan opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
15 of 16 tasks

EIPIP Meeting 102 #326

poojaranjan opened this issue Mar 13, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member

poojaranjan commented Mar 13, 2024

Date and Time

March 27 April 10, 2024 at 17:30 UTC

Location

Zoom: TBA in the Discord #eip-editing channel

YouTube Recording: EIPIP Meetings

Agenda

1. Discuss Open Issues/PRs, and other topics

Edit to Final Proposals

Potential Spam

PR for review by RIP Editors

Community proposals added to Issues

How to lower the number of open Issues & Pull Requests?

Call for Input

Call For Input Status Inclination/Result Deadline
#317 Closed @SamWilsn: "I don't really see a clear consensus. @g11tech is likely in favour since he made this proposal, and @lightclient has clearly expressed his opposition. I'm going to close this as rejected, but am fine with re-opening if there's more discussion to be had." March 20th, 2024
#318 Closed This is past the deadline, and the general consensus appears to be to not merge this PR. March 20th, 2024
#321 Closed @SamWilsn: "See #291 (comment) for a bit more detail on my reasoning, but the short form is Final means Final, and we only allow updates to correct errors in the specification." March 22nd, 2024
#320 Open @g11tech , is the only editor responded and is in favor. Didn't receive any response from any other editor March 21st, 2024
#325 Open @lightclient @SamWilsn are in favor. @xinbenlv seems to be coming around for this, but have suggestions to have policy defined around such issues April 7th, 2024
#327 Open @SamWilsn is in favor, requires input from other editors April 12th, 2024
#329 Open requires input from other editors April 29th, 2024
#331 Open @SamWilsn & @lightclient are in favor of merging this pull request. requires input from other editors April 29th, 2024
#332 Open @g11tech is against entertaining such PRs and closing them off, requires input from other editors May 8, 2024

2. Other discussions and updates from past meetings

  • Web Page Rendering to include EIPs, ERCs, RIPs
  • Working Group Charter

3. EIPs Insight - Monthly EIPs status reporting.

4. EIP Editing Office Hour

  • Agenda 35 Video 34

5. Review action items from earlier meetings

Next Meeting date & time

May 01, 2024 at 17:30 UTC

@poojaranjan
Copy link
Member Author

Summary

1. Discuss Open Issues/PRs, and other topics

Edit to Final Proposals

ethereum/ERCs#304

  • Just spelling corrections, @SamWilsn found this good to be merged. No one opposed it.
  • Will be merged.

ethereum/ERCs#317

  • @SamWilsn is okay with this as well. No one in the meeting opposed it.

ethereum/ERCs#367

  • @SamWilsn will create a Call For Input for this Pull Request.
Generally speaking editors are willing to consider case by case Call for Input for Pull Requests to update Final EIPs.

ethereum/ERCs#342

  • Editors will wait for Richard Moore to comment on this.

ethereum/ERCs#324

  • Already closed

Potential Spams

ethereum/EIPs#8352

  • Marked spam, Issue not found anymore

https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/8371

PR for review by RIP Editors

ethereum/RIPs#17

  • No RIP editor available on the call.
  • EIP/ERC Editors are welcome to review the proposal.

Community proposals added to Issues

ethereum/EIPs#8308

  • @SamWilsn left a comment to ask for clarification from the proposer
  • Version upgrade proposal may solve the problem

ethereum/EIPs#8292

  • No objection from @SamWilsn
  • He will respond to the proposer to make a Pull Request fo the proposal

ethereum/EIPs#8284

  • @xinbenlv provided context
  • @SamWilsn thinks that these tasks will be taken care of with the working group
  • once editors agree on the working group, it will be handles

ethereum/EIPs#8282

  • This is also taken care with the working group concept

ethereum/EIPs#8269

  • Recommended to share the idea on FEM page. Issue closed.

How to lower the number of open Issues & Pull Requests?

Call for Input

#320

  • @SamWilsn was initially against it.
  • @xinbenlv and @g11tech seems to be in favor
  • after discussing, the decision is that Links to CAIP proposals are allowed.

#325

  • The decision is that EIP-1193's author list is updated.

#329

  • @xinbenlv is in favor of 3
  • @SamWilsn wants to take it case by case
  • @g11tech wants to reject such PRs, people may update their name but not add/remove the list
  • editors may leave comments and decision will be taken at the end of the deadline

#327

  • leave comments

#331

  • leave comments

#332

  • leave comments

Next Meeting date & time - April 24, 2024 at 17:30 UTC

@poojaranjan poojaranjan mentioned this issue Apr 11, 2024
19 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant