You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Checksum should be allowed to be a single dictionary at the top level scope only, even for bundles/extensions (where there are top level sources as well)
#4413
Open
Micket opened this issue
Dec 22, 2023
· 0 comments
Instead of having it per bundle component/extensions, we should allow the checksum block to be placed outside.
We should also encourage that use pattern. It would likely simplify a lot of bundles making them significantly shorter, and probably simplify some code as well.
Micket
changed the title
Checksum should be allowed to be a single dictionary at the top level scope only, even for bundles
Checksum should be allowed to be a single dictionary at the top level scope only, even for bundles/extensions (where there are top level sources as well)
Dec 22, 2023
Instead of having it per bundle component/extensions, we should allow the checksum block to be placed outside.
We should also encourage that use pattern. It would likely simplify a lot of bundles making them significantly shorter, and probably simplify some code as well.
Example of current situation:
and what we could change it into:
Also, checksums should just be a dictionary, instead of a list of dictionaries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: