Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confusing Alphanumeric Characters to Avoid in IDs? #2

Open
8 tasks
nelsonic opened this issue Nov 3, 2018 · 2 comments
Open
8 tasks

Confusing Alphanumeric Characters to Avoid in IDs? #2

nelsonic opened this issue Nov 3, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested

Comments

@nelsonic
Copy link
Member

nelsonic commented Nov 3, 2018

Most computer scientists or "developers" consider the "happy path" when building software
and don't get to see the "other side" ... I have seen all aspects of the "stack" from having worked in "customer service" (call centres) and had to field calls from angry/frustrated people.
Putting in a little bit more effort up-front to create human-friendly IDs pays later.
I feel that the default needs to be usability and accessibility; that's why this issue exists.

Todo

  • Auto-generated IDs should exclude certain "confusing" characters
    to avoid confusing people who are reading or typing them.

For example: 0 (zero) looks like O (Capital o) and I (capital i) looks like l (lower-case L).

  • Collate full list of "confusing characters"
  • Calculate probability of collision when using reduced character set

Recommended Reading

@nelsonic nelsonic added help wanted Extra attention is needed good first issue Good for newcomers question Further information is requested labels Nov 3, 2018
@nelsonic nelsonic added this to To do in Nelson's List via automation Nov 9, 2018
@nelsonic
Copy link
Member Author

nelsonic commented Dec 5, 2018

@nelsonic
Copy link
Member Author

nelsonic commented Dec 5, 2018

Basically, what I'm describing is Base56
I love it when the thing I'm thinking about already has a name and "validation"!
The worst thing is being "original" (i.e. "crazy") and having to "convince" people of an idea!
This is soooooo much more time-effective.
Just go read this wikipedia article that someone else wrote! 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
Projects
Nelson's List
  
More ToDo ThanCanEver Be Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant