-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MetaNetX annotations not added properly #106
Comments
Yes, this is a bug. The correct prefixes are https://registry.identifiers.org/registry/metanetx.chemical |
If I am not mistaken the ModelPolisher just draws this from AnnotateDB, right?
If so, and this is basically an upstream bug, it does not really seem sensible to me to try and fix it in the Polisher. I'd be happy to help fix it in AnnotateDB though. |
Thanks. So this is most likely my bug in the annotation database :/ Just opened an issue matthiaskoenig/annotatedb#42 |
@NantiaL I'll close this for now then |
Keep it open until it is fixed upstream, so other users can find it |
I just realized this is also an issue with the data in BiGG too, so this issue is very much unresolved anyways. |
I can normalize this in annotatedb, i.e. add the prefixes. |
Update for the problem described in issue #103
Update on this problem:
|
When reading a model created with ModelPolisher with COBRApy, a series of warnings appear pointed to the fact that the MetaNetX annotations are not added in the desired form using identifiers.org. The following is an example of such a warning for the MetaNetX ID MNXR98569:
Here is the annotation entry of the .XML file:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: