Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include oxidations in hydrophobicity scales #44

Open
Stortebecker opened this issue Mar 15, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Include oxidations in hydrophobicity scales #44

Stortebecker opened this issue Mar 15, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@Stortebecker
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

when calculating peptide hydrophobicity, it would be nice to include the possibility of common modifications. For MS, especially oxidation of methionine would be of interest. M[ox] dramatically reduces the hydrophobicity of a peptide, as mentioned in Eichacker et al, 2004:

When compared with the Eisenberg scale (39), a single oxidation of methionine would reduce the hydrophobicity from 0.64 to –0.76 (Fig. 6A). A double oxidation would decrease the hydrophobicity of the peptide to –2.0 (Fig. 6A). Such a drastic shift of one single amino acid may contribute to the physical properties of the hydrophobic transmembrane peptide in a way that the peptide becomes detectable.

However, I am not sure, how we could provide this feature in the hydrophobicity function. Reading tags for oxidation / dioxidation like [+16] from the given sequence would be nice, but is so far not supported by any of the functions, I think. A workaround would be to use additional integer parameters like oxidated, dioxidated where the user can specify how many oxidations occur on the given peptide. For the hydrophobicity function, the exact localization of the oxidation would be rather insignificant.

Also, I do not know if all hydrophobicity scales define oxidations. Some research would be needed for correct implementation.

What is your opinion about this?

Greetings, Florian

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant