Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RFC6331: Moving DIGEST-MD5 to Historic #397

Open
Neustradamus opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

RFC6331: Moving DIGEST-MD5 to Historic #397

Neustradamus opened this issue Nov 3, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@Neustradamus
Copy link

Neustradamus commented Nov 3, 2020

Dear @dinhvh,

31 August 2006: RFC4616: The PLAIN Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanism:

20 November 2008: CRAM-MD5 to Historic:

29 June 2017: CRAM-MD5 to Historic:

July 2011: RFC6331: Moving DIGEST-MD5 to Historic:

August 2021: RFC9051: Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) - Version 4rev2:
"Replaced DIGEST-MD5 SASL mechanism with SCRAM-SHA-256. DIGEST-MD5 was deprecated."

In more LOGIN (it has been replaced by PLAIN), CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, I add same about NTLM and KERBEROS_V4.

There are now:

  • July 2010: RFC5802: Salted Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM): SASL and GSS-API Mechanisms: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5802 (SCRAM-SHA-1 and SCRAM-SHA-1-PLUS)
  • July 2010: RFC5803: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema for Storing Salted: Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) Secrets: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5803
  • November 2015: RFC7677: SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS: Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7677

Soon:

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Author

Dear @dinhvh,

Can you remove old unsecure mechanisms?

  • CRAM-MD5
  • DIGEST-MD5
  • SCRAM MD5

Thanks in advance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant