Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS) + SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS) supports #396

Open
Neustradamus opened this issue Nov 1, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@Neustradamus
Copy link

Neustradamus commented Nov 1, 2020

CRAM-MD5 to Historic:

RFC6331: Moving DIGEST-MD5 to Historic:

RFC 8600:
"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".

SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS):

SCRAM-SHA-256(-PLUS):

SCRAM-SHA-512(-PLUS):

SCRAM-SHA3-512(-PLUS):

-PLUS variants:

IMAP:

LDAP:

  • RFC5803: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema for Storing Salted: Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) Secrets: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5803

HTTP:

2FA:

IANA:

Note, after SCRAM-SHA-1(-PLUS):

Linked to:

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Author

Dear @dinhvh,

Happy New Year 2022!

Have you looked for SCRAM-SHA-* supports?
The first step is without -PLUS variants.

Thanks in advance.

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Author

Dear @dinhvh,

Have you looked for SCRAM-SHA-* supports?
The first step is without -PLUS variants.

Time to support new IMAP RFC?

Thanks in advance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant