Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Confidentiality/Privacy Clauses #13

Open
padraic opened this issue Jan 22, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Confidentiality/Privacy Clauses #13

padraic opened this issue Jan 22, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@padraic
Copy link

padraic commented Jan 22, 2016

During the investigation the reporter(s) should respect the Community Mediation Team's workings, and the privacy of the accused offending party. For example, there should be no public shaming of the accused offending party, nor of the Community Mediation Team's way of handling things before a conclusion by the team is reached.

For the avoidance of doubt and equal treatment, this should be worded to apply to all parties in the process whether they be a reporter, the accused, or any other involved parties. It should probably also stress "confidentiality" of the details. That might cover the issue from all angles without specifically attaching it to just one party or one action. "Public shaming" presumes a breach of confidentiality after all.

I know there's a balancing act to the Covenant term focused on reporter privacy, but that may indicate the Covenant text could be modified directly to contain this? Have it in one location, not spread across two or three?

@padraic
Copy link
Author

padraic commented Jan 22, 2016

Note: I'll create a PR later with suggested changes for consideration. I'm stuck away from my PC for the time being.

@brandonsavage
Copy link

You might also think about adding that public shaming itself is a violation of the Code of Conduct, regardless of when it happens.

@padraic
Copy link
Author

padraic commented Jan 31, 2016

Public shaming is a legal activity, assuming you mean calling out people online over their opinions or running campaigns against companies.

So, er, no? The COC is not here to police opinions. If the "shaming" constitutes harassment then it would fall under the COC. Harassment is illegal. Libel is also illegal.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants