Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

You need a manual and exec examples #3

Open
yetithefoot opened this issue Oct 1, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

You need a manual and exec examples #3

yetithefoot opened this issue Oct 1, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@yetithefoot
Copy link

No description provided.

@roynasser
Copy link

+1... where should I run this?

thks

@gabrielkrell
Copy link

Agreed. I'm a new user and having some trouble figuring this out.

@roynasser
Copy link

I'm not sure how much development is going on here... you might want to check out GAM...

Its a lot more than just recursive ownership, but one of the branches does include a recursive ownership command... hopefully it wll be integrated into the main one soon but I've been using it without problem.

It has a "transfer" command to transfer files and folders, and it also has a "claim" command to ensure that anything inside a partiular folder is automatically "re-owned" by a specific user. This is very useful in some scenarios and I'm really surprised more tools dont incporate similar level of ACL and Granular permission controls in gapps... its mind boggling from someone coming from a "file share" environemnt... (Plus it tends to become a complete mess when anyone stores any document in any folder they want...yikes...)

anyways here is the fork you want: https://github.com/jay0lee/GAM/wiki (manual)
and the fork that includes claim and transfer: https://github.com/lerklompen/GAM

Good luck!

@gabrielkrell
Copy link

gabrielkrell commented Jun 14, 2016

Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately, my usage case is a little different; I'm a regular ol' user trying to export his stuff before he leaves. That tool is nice, but seems to require admin rights on the domain. Looks like a much better alternative for most users of this program, though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants