Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RDocumentation.org website - packages not linked to author papge #69

Open
Bernice0321 opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@Bernice0321
Copy link

Hello,

I am a Ph.D. student, and I have been working with my advisor on developing and maintaining 17 R packages on CRAN.
By looking at the 17 packages on the RDocumentation.org website, we find out there are four packages missing from the author page (see below link):
https://www.rdocumentation.org/collaborators/name/Hakan%20Demirtas

However, these 4 packages can be found in the RDocumentation.org directly but they are not linked to the author page like the other 13 packages:
(1) https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/UnivRNG/versions/1.2.3
(2) https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/MultiRNG/versions/1.2.4
(3) https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/MultiVarMI/versions/1.0
(4) https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/RNGforGPD/versions/1.1.0

Can someone help me with a solution?

In addition, I do see myself as a maintainer, but when I click the link (https://www.rdocumentation.org/collaborators/name/Ran%20Gao), it says the page doesn't exist.

Many thanks!!

@lvanacken
Copy link

Hi

Thanks for this inquiry.

A colleague pointed out that RDocs is currently using depsy.com to determine the authors/collaborators of a package.
For reference see here https://github.com/datacamp/rdocumentation-2.0/blob/a442a6b6de6070da46d1657c912c65b7c3422bda/pages/collaborators/name/[collaborator].tsx and here https://github.com/datacamp/RDocumentation-app/blob/master/api/controllers/CollaboratorController.js

Unfortunately Depsy is not being maintained anymore since a few years and hence information might be in accurate.
We are also not immediately aware of a good alternative where we could draw information from to make sure the information on the R packages with regard to authors/collaborators is as accurate as possible.

Hope this provides a reason why, without a solution though to the problem itself though :(.

We appreciate the interest in RDocs!

Thanks
Lode

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants