Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Type definitions for observables #485

Open
TrySound opened this issue Sep 6, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

Type definitions for observables #485

TrySound opened this issue Sep 6, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@TrySound
Copy link
Contributor

TrySound commented Sep 6, 2017

from in types accepts Observable which is not correct. It should be { [SymbolObservable]: Observable } according source code.
Flow has some problems with symbols. Don't know about typescript.

@briancavalier
Copy link
Member

briancavalier commented Sep 6, 2017

Sadly, I don't think it's possible in Flow right now to use symbols. That basically means that Flow users aren't doing to be able to use Observables in general, so I don't think we're currently making the situation any worse. If we are, though, and there's a way we could do better, I'm all for it.

@TylorS @Frikki: do either of you know if it's possible in TS?

@TylorS
Copy link
Collaborator

TylorS commented Sep 6, 2017

In TypeScript the situation is similar. I've been following this thread for over a year now.

TypeScript is only capable of handling "well-known" (by TypeScript) Symbols in types. e.g. Symbol.iterator and other Symbol.**.

@briancavalier
Copy link
Member

Thanks @TylorS. Seems like we've done all we can do for now until Flow and TS support Symbol.observable.

@Kinrany
Copy link

Kinrany commented Mar 18, 2019

In TypeScript the situation is similar. I've been following this thread for over a year now.

microsoft/TypeScript#5579 has been fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants