Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for loading multiple imports per component (localization) #23

Open
swernerx opened this issue Mar 21, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

Comments

@swernerx
Copy link

I'd like to see support for loading locale-specific i18n message files together with the actual view component. This would allow for route-splitted translation files which, as the view itself, are just loaded on demand e.g. for usage with IntlProvider by react-intl.

Conceptually it might look like:

const AboutView = createLazyComponent({
  load: (language) => {
    return [
      import("./views/About"),
      import("./views/About." + language + ".json")
    ]
  }
})

but int theory instead of an array we could also use an object/dict for being more specific:

const AboutView = createLazyComponent({
  load: (language) => {
    return {
      view: import("./views/About"),
      messages: import("./views/About." + language + ".json")
    }
  }
})

If there are messages it would probably be a good idea to use IntlProvider with the messages given for wrapping the dynamically loaded view. It might be also cool to use injectIntl for offering the intl API via props to the loaded view.

What do you think?

@swernerx swernerx changed the title Add support for loading multiple imports per component Add support for loading multiple imports per component (localization) Mar 21, 2017
@swernerx
Copy link
Author

swernerx commented Mar 21, 2017

I tried implementing these requirements in style of your component in this file:
https://github.com/sebastian-software/edgestack/blob/master/src/api/common/createLazyComponent.js

But I would like working on a single solution instead of implementing too many alternatives.

@ctrlplusb
Copy link
Owner

ctrlplusb commented Apr 3, 2017

Hey @swernerx

Thanks for this suggestion.

With the latest code parse I did a bit of renaming to help the API move towards supporting something like your request.

My initial idea is to allow an additional prop to be provided to an async component instance. Specifically a render callback function. The render callback would then receive the result of the render. Something like:

const AboutView = asyncComponent({
  resolve: (props) => {
    const { language } = props
    return Promise.all([
      import("./views/About"),
      import("./views/About." + language + ".json")
   ])
  },
  passThroughProps: ['language']
})

<AboutView
  language="de"
  render={(resolved) => {
    const [ View, translations ] = resolved
    return <View translations={translations} />
  }}
/>

The props pass through to the resolver poses an interesting question though. This would affect our caching. We would have to cache a result per variation of prop. Therefore we may need to consider adding an additional configuration value to asyncComponent called something like passThroughProps that would allow you define which props to pass to asyncComponent. These props would then be used as keys in a cache map of sorts.

Thoughts?

@swernerx
Copy link
Author

swernerx commented Apr 4, 2017

Looks good.

I just figure it would be nicer from the API standpoint to use named parameters/fields instead of array indexes and destructing. In this case we can't use Promise.all() as this does not work for objects... but it would be nicer from the usage standpoint. We could just return an objet in resolve() with { view: xx, translations: xx } and let the promise handling being done inside of asyncComponent.

I wonder what's the benefit of making the pass-through config required? Why not just pass-through all props?

@djeeg
Copy link

djeeg commented Apr 11, 2017

Perfect,

I want to try something like this

<Switch>
	<Route path="/section1" render={(props) => (
		<Layout store={this.context.store} {...props} />
	)} />
</Switch>
const Layout = asyncComponent({
    resolve: (props) => {
        return Promise.all([
            System.import('./LayoutAsync'),
            System.import('./../logic/section1')
        ]).then(function([component, module]) {
            injectReducer(props.store, {key: 'section1State', reducer: module.reducer});
            injectSagas(props.store, module.SagasList);
            return component;
        })
    }
});

@hoschi
Copy link

hoschi commented Apr 26, 2017

interesting, a lot of people solving the same problem :)
I did a prototype here https://github.com/hoschi/react-async-component/tree/feature/render

Here is an example usage:

import React from 'react';
import GeneralIcon from 'place/GeneralIcon'
import { asyncComponent } from 'react-async-component';

export let config = {
    resolve: (props) => import( /* webpackChunkName: "dynamic-icons" */ `icons/${props.iconName}/iconDescription`),
    getModuleId: (props) => props.iconName,
    autoResolveES2015Default: false,
    render: (iconDescription, props) => <GeneralIcon {...props} iconDescription={ iconDescription } />,
};

export default asyncComponent(config);

This can be used to

  • apply module content to a generic component
  • bundling each file in a directory as its own bundle and decide at runtime by props which to show
  • loading one module which contain different parts of the app, like @djeeg showed

As my use case is a bit different, I create another ticket this or next week.

@hoschi
Copy link

hoschi commented May 9, 2017

I created issue #44 for my use case

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants