You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think it would be nice if the double dagger U+2021 ‡ would be more distinguishable from the dagger U+2020 †—similar to how the triple dagger U+2E4B ⹋ is clearly distinguishable from the dagger:
If a change is made, I would not complain if the PUA superscripts variants U+F0086 and U+F0087 would be similarly changed.
(And I would definitely not complain about the addition of a PUA superscript triple dagger.)
Happy new year!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good idea! The current one looks ineffective as a dagger anyway, so perhaps using a less literal design is the way to go. I think some fonts just join two daggers end to end, perhaps that works. The triple dagger 2E4B is obviously not dangerous, unless it's thrown at your enemy.
Thanks for a nice and extremely useful font!
I think it would be nice if the double dagger U+2021
‡
would be more distinguishable from the dagger U+2020†
—similar to how the triple dagger U+2E4B⹋
is clearly distinguishable from the dagger:If a change is made, I would not complain if the PUA superscripts variants U+F0086 and U+F0087 would be similarly changed.
(And I would definitely not complain about the addition of a PUA superscript triple dagger.)
Happy new year!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: