Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stanford buildings in OpenHistoricalMap #42

Open
1ec5 opened this issue Jun 18, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Stanford buildings in OpenHistoricalMap #42

1ec5 opened this issue Jun 18, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@1ec5
Copy link
Member

1ec5 commented Jun 18, 2023

The Rumsey Map Center at Stanford often holds map-related events that are opportunities to bring up OpenStreetMap and OpenHistoricalMap. For example, @jeffreyameyer and I will be demonstrating OHM there in August for the California Map Society’s annual conference. The talk will be much more relevant if we can demonstrate OHM’s coverage of the campus we’re speaking at.

Stanford Maps & Records has a basemap that includes buildings, but it isn’t suitably licensed for OSM. Rather than go through the trouble of getting this data released into the public domain, I’d suggest starting off with a portion of Santa Clara County’s building layer, which is explicitly in the public domain (and by law). The county building layer has reasonable geometry, although some buildings are conjoined due to the LiDAR-based collection method. Each building comes with a “base height” and “building height” presumably in feet, but we’ll need to double-check.

The county building layer doesn’t have any building names, but I figure we can get plenty them from out-of-copyright maps in the Stanford University Map Collection or the Stanford Atlas. As for start dates, the university archives have a number of useful resources, but it’ll take some work to find dates for everything:

The usual local resources, such as CEQA reports, may also be useful for establishing dates.

The historical sources will provide information on buildings that are no longer standing, which the county building layer does not include.

@1ec5
Copy link
Member Author

1ec5 commented Jun 18, 2023

The geometries in the county building layer are reasonably clean, but they filled in a lot of courtyards that’ll have to be redrawn manually:

Main Quad

@1ec5
Copy link
Member Author

1ec5 commented Jul 20, 2023

Here’s a crude GeoJSON of the Stanford campus to filter the county building layer on.

@jeffreyameyer
Copy link

jeffreyameyer commented Jul 20, 2023

Perhaps easier access than the SCC geoportal: SCC GIS shapefiles at Stanford

Old Campus maps

@1ec5
Copy link
Member Author

1ec5 commented Dec 12, 2023

@jeffreyameyer looks like you’ve already imported the buildings. What’s left to do before we close this issue out?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants