You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks for the great work and congrats for CVPR acceptance. I saw in the code that ob_dist and ob_view are directly concatenated with anchor feature and input to the MLPs. Would using positional encoding (like in NeRF) further improve the view-dependent appearance rendering? as it captures high frequency variations, thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks. We choose direct concatenation because 1) reducing the total computation; 2) we find that a naive PE does not always contribute to a better results. Further explorations are welcome.
Hi, thanks for the great work and congrats for CVPR acceptance. I saw in the code that ob_dist and ob_view are directly concatenated with anchor feature and input to the MLPs. Would using positional encoding (like in NeRF) further improve the view-dependent appearance rendering? as it captures high frequency variations, thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: