You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
C-{hjkl} works well for me, but I'm wondering about C-\.
Let's say I'm working on buffer1, and then buffer2. C-\ will go back to buffer1. C-\ will go again to buffer2.
At this moment,
[case1] Hitting C-\ will go back to buffer1
[case2] Instead, with the mouse (or tmux <leader>q1), I jump to shell.
I want to work again, so C-\ will go back to buffer2.
Up to here, it worked as expected.
So, now at buffer2, what should happen when hitting C-\ here?
Shouldn't it go back to the shell?
But in my case, it goes to buffer1 as if it's the [case1] (the previous split inside vim). Is this intended or my setting is wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the kind words, @ywpkwon! Hmm, I'll be honest that this functionality is some of the subtler stuff and I'm frankly less familiar with it. I wonder if the usage of the mouse is causing the disconnect?
But what if the jump comes from tmux <leader>q1? (<leader>q displays numbers for each pane and let you jump.)
My point is that, once focus comes from outside vim to one of vim splits, I feel like "c-\" only switches between vim splits instead of going back to outside vim.
Thanks for this great plugin!!
Let's say 3 windows (2 tmux panes {shell, vim}, and vim split).
C-{hjkl}
works well for me, but I'm wondering aboutC-\
.Let's say I'm working on
buffer1
, and thenbuffer2
.C-\
will go back tobuffer1
.C-\
will go again tobuffer2
.At this moment,
[case1] Hitting
C-\
will go back tobuffer1
[case2] Instead, with the mouse (or tmux
<leader>q1
), I jump toshell
.I want to work again, so
C-\
will go back tobuffer2
.Up to here, it worked as expected.
So, now at
buffer2
, what should happen when hittingC-\
here?Shouldn't it go back to the
shell
?But in my case, it goes to
buffer1
as if it's the [case1] (the previous split inside vim). Is this intended or my setting is wrong?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: