You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have noticed that the default parameter for '--ul-tip' is set to 6, which is explained as removing tip unitigs composed of less than or equal to INT reads during the ultra-long (UL) assembly process. Does this suggest that ONT ultra-long reads with a coverage depth of less than 6 are considered useless when using the default parameter? However, according to my testing, these ONT ultra-long reads still demonstrate an improvement in assembly continuity. Could this indicate that I have introduced an error somewhere? Thank you for your assistance.
(我注意到“--ul-tip”的默认参数是6,它的解释是remove tip unitigs composed of <=INT reads for the UL assembly。这是否意味了覆盖深度低于6的ONT ultra long reads使用默认参数是无用的。然而经过我的测试,这样的ONT ultra long reads仍然可以提升组装连续性,这是否说明了我引入了错误呢。谢谢!)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have noticed that the default parameter for '--ul-tip' is set to 6, which is explained as removing tip unitigs composed of less than or equal to INT reads during the ultra-long (UL) assembly process. Does this suggest that ONT ultra-long reads with a coverage depth of less than 6 are considered useless when using the default parameter? However, according to my testing, these ONT ultra-long reads still demonstrate an improvement in assembly continuity. Could this indicate that I have introduced an error somewhere? Thank you for your assistance.
(我注意到“--ul-tip”的默认参数是6,它的解释是remove tip unitigs composed of <=INT reads for the UL assembly。这是否意味了覆盖深度低于6的ONT ultra long reads使用默认参数是无用的。然而经过我的测试,这样的ONT ultra long reads仍然可以提升组装连续性,这是否说明了我引入了错误呢。谢谢!)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: