Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No candidate objects found #318

Open
hohenstaufen opened this issue May 11, 2020 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #323
Open

No candidate objects found #318

hohenstaufen opened this issue May 11, 2020 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #323

Comments

@hohenstaufen
Copy link

Upload task always report "No candidate objects found".

Execute scheduled task: Object file system upload task (tool_objectfs\task\push_objects_to_storage) ... started 17:23:06. Current memory use 36.6MB. No candidate objects found. ... used 1 dbqueries ... used 0.18827605247498 seconds Scheduled task complete: Object file system upload task (tool_objectfs\task\push_objects_to_storage)

On moodle 3.8.3.
settings

immagine

Any idea on what could be wrong?

@hohenstaufen hohenstaufen linked a pull request May 12, 2020 that will close this issue
@dennis-ciancoders
Copy link

Any hints on this?, I'm having the exact same problem

@choma
Copy link

choma commented Feb 28, 2021

I was having this problem too. I'm using moodle 3.8.2 with DigitalOcean Spaces.
It was correctly uploading all the 9 tests files, but no other files were uploaded.

I applied the changes on PR #323 by hand, and it started to work. Is it safe to leave it like this? is the travis problem the only reason to not merge this PR?

@guillefd
Copy link

guillefd commented Mar 1, 2021

Yes, this PR #323 is not merged to the stable version (don't know why) but it works ok, I'm using DO spaces on 4 production sites for 6 month now (on moodle 3.9), and works great.
The only detail is that files on spaces are not being deleted when they are deleted locally, have tried the last moodle-tool_objectfs version and still has this issue, but everything else works fine.

@gcavalcante8808
Copy link

I just created the PR #413, which is simpler than #323, as it apply the specific 323 DO client fix to the current master.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants