Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IDS Audit Tool: Wrong error message for Pset_FootCommon.LoadBearing and Pset_FurnitureTypeCommon.Reference #257

Open
MatthiasWeise opened this issue Mar 11, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
Discussion documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Milestone

Comments

@MatthiasWeise
Copy link

Both properties exist in IFC4, but are wrongly reported as an error. It is most likely due to an update in IFC4.0.2.0.
My understanding of IFC4 in IDS is that it is based on latest official version, IFC4.0.2.1.

Error 103: Invalid property baseName LoadBearing (accepted values are Reference,Status) in the context of Ifc4 on 'simpleValue' element at line

@CBenghi
Copy link
Contributor

CBenghi commented Mar 11, 2024

Hello @andyward,
any idea if XBIM has ways to control the minor versioning of Xbim.Essentials to generate the right metadata for the IDS Audit tool?

@CBenghi CBenghi added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation Discussion labels Mar 11, 2024
@CBenghi
Copy link
Contributor

CBenghi commented Mar 11, 2024

Marked for discussion and documentation in order to discuss the expected schema versions, and document it.

@andyward
Copy link
Contributor

Hello @andyward, any idea if XBIM has ways to control the minor versioning of Xbim.Essentials to generate the right metadata for the IDS Audit tool?

Hi @CBenghi

My understanding is that IDS only supports 'Official' schemas, not Retired/Withdrawn. So I don't see how we'd need to validate for specific IFC schema minor versions, since currently:

IFC2x3 = IFC2x3 TC2 = 2.3.0.1
IFC4 = IFC4 ADD2 TC1 = 4.0.2.1
IFC4x3 = IFC 4.3 ADD2 = 4.3.2.0

I'd guess the issue is that xbim.Properties (used in ids-lib) must not have been updated based on the IFC4 pset xml definitions in the latest addendums. We updated it for 4x3 ADD2 recently but it's quite possible it never gott updated for IFC4 ADD2+

@CBenghi
Copy link
Contributor

CBenghi commented Mar 12, 2024

Hi Andy,
You're quite right, I read this quickly and mixed up in my mind schemas and properties.
I'll review the details tomorrow.
Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants