You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, it is definitely a major step ahead to include charges. Here is a review from the HDNNP by Professor Jörg Behler (https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00868) and page 15 - 20 goes over their latest scheme of incorporating charges and might be useful for brainstorm the charge implementations for NEP. Just want to add a comment that while adding this new features, might be useful to do benchmarking on efficiency too? I love NEP because it is always the best in terms of balancing efficiency and accuracy. I would love to see NEP is always the fastest code for large scale MD simulations.
Thanks for the comments. This review is very helpful! I also hope to keep the superior speed of NEP, so I was thinking a non-Ewald way to evaluate the Coulomb forces.
Many users hope to have this feature.
How to set up the charges:
How to evaluate the interactions from the charges?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: