Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BioJS DNA logo is left-handed and wrong #158

Open
daviddao opened this issue Mar 24, 2016 · 13 comments
Open

BioJS DNA logo is left-handed and wrong #158

daviddao opened this issue Mar 24, 2016 · 13 comments
Labels

Comments

@daviddao
Copy link
Member

After showing BioJS to scientist at the Broad Institute, they realized that the DNA inside the logo is left-handed while DNA in nature is right-handed.

f04-05

We should consider removing the DNA from the logo to stay consistent with our corporate design on the website: https://biojsnet.herokuapp.com/

@daviddao daviddao added the bug label Mar 24, 2016
@daviddao
Copy link
Member Author

@greenify any comments on that?

@wilzbach
Copy link
Member

Quite astonished to realize that :D

How about mirroring the DNA in the SVG and we should be good to go? @daviddao do you have time to do that?

We should consider removing the DNA from the logo to stay consistent with our corporate design on the website

I think you know that I personally don't like the plain green circle - especially because I know how it was created
-> I would prefer if we could stick with the DNA

@AgrawalAmey
Copy link

I guess this should sort the problem. Also the logo now weighs 5kbs instead of 44kbs.

@daviddao
Copy link
Member Author

@AgrawalAmey we don't have permission for that

@daviddao
Copy link
Member Author

@jessica-jordan @manuelcorpas what are your thoughts about the logo?

@wilzbach
Copy link
Member

daviddao means that we can't access your file due to your file permissions.

On 2016-03-25 16:36, Amey Agrawal wrote:

@daviddao It was just implementation of suggestion by @greenify .


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#158 (comment)

@AgrawalAmey
Copy link

Sorry for inconvenience,I have fixed the link.

@rajido
Copy link
Member

rajido commented Mar 25, 2016

I think it is bit bias to genetics/genomics to use the DNA. Why not a protein, an antibody, a cell or a plant? I like more the plain logo but I might be bias as well.

@jayjayjpg
Copy link

@daviddao thanks for the great comment. I personally like the dna in the logo, as it makes the graphic harder to confuse with the recycling brand logo.

Still, I see the point that it wouldn't have to be DNA in particular, but what could we use instead?

@daviddao
Copy link
Member Author

@jessica-jordan I agree with @rajido! A cell would be very nice! :) It is beautiful under microscope, colorful when stained and can be seen as an abstract module of a bigger organism and therefore fits BioJS a lot.

myimage

@jayjayjpg
Copy link

@daviddao @rajido I like the cell idea a lot. Is someone of you proficient with Photoshop? If not, I'll also try my luck with that

@daviddao
Copy link
Member Author

I am looking forward to your design :)

@rajido
Copy link
Member

rajido commented Mar 25, 2016

@jessica-jordan ... I think it is a good sign the first thing that comes to your mind when you look at the current logo is the idea of recycling/reusing. It might be worth a try the idea of the cell. However I would try to keep it simple and ideally similar since for better or worse people already identifies the logo with BioJS.

Instead of DNA, protein, eukaryotic cell, virus or anything specific of one particular domain of biology I would try with something more common used in bioinformatics, something like annotations. In bioinformatics we have annotations for everything ... genes, proteins, phenotypes, cells ... Something that could play well with the current logo would be annotations similar to those represented by the circos visualisation ... http://circos.ca/images/samples/

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants