Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Citing BioJS #145

Open
DevasenaInupakutika opened this issue Feb 3, 2015 · 5 comments
Open

Citing BioJS #145

DevasenaInupakutika opened this issue Feb 3, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@DevasenaInupakutika
Copy link
Contributor

What's the recommended citation for BioJS 2.0?

@wilzbach
Copy link
Member

wilzbach commented Feb 3, 2015

The only summary publication that I am aware of is "BioJS: an open source JavaScript framework for biological data visualization". However it is from 2012 and absolutely outdated - so I wouldn't recommend this as citation.

AFAIK there are plans to publish a new publication - @manuelcorpas should know more ;-)

@rowlandm
Copy link

But at least it would be a start to point to the 2012 article?

@jmvillaveces
Copy link
Contributor

@rowlandm
Copy link

Thanks Jose.

Cheers,

Rowland
El feb. 27, 2015 8:19 PM, "José Villaveces" notifications@github.com
escribió:

Alternatively, you can cite "BioJS: an open source standard for
biological visualisation - its status in 2014"
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25075290.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#145 (comment).

@daviddao
Copy link
Member

We should cite the BioJS 2.0 community paper:

Guy Yachdav, Tatyana Goldberg, Sebastian Wilzbach, David Dao, Iris Shih, Saket Choudhary, Steve Crouch, Max Franz, Alexander García, Leyla J García, Björn A Grüning, Devasena Inupakutika, Ian Sillitoe, Anil S Thanki, Bruno Vieira, José M Villaveces, Maria V Schneider, Suzanna Lewis, Steve Pettifer, Burkhard Rost, and Manuel Corpas
Anatomy of BioJS, an open source community for the life sciences. eLife 2015;4:e07009

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants