New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dup should have an alt when available #638
Comments
I'm open to this idea, but it opens up a much larger issue for a few design principles:
For this proposal, we need to consider what happens when ref is not provided. (And, in fact, excluding the ref sequence is actually preferred by many on the HGVS committee because it's redundant information.)
Clearly, Variants do have a
I don't have an easy solution to handle the proposed |
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days. |
This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 7 days with no activity. |
This issue was closed by stalebot. It has been reopened to give more time for community review. See biocommons coding guidelines for stale issue and pull request policies. This resurrection is expected to be a one-time event. |
This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 7 days. |
Related to #581.
If we have
DUMMY:c.2_4dupATC
, then I was expecting theDup
class to have both aref
ANDalt
defined. Currently, it only hasref
defined.The HGVS recommendation is not to include the duplicated bases, so in that case the current code has
ref
beNone
, but when the duplicated bases are includedref
is properly stored. To save space,alt
could just be:What to folks think?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: