We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bindl exec
bindl exec NAME [args ...] would:
bindl exec NAME [args ...]
args
STDIN
STDOUT
STDERR
The existence and implementation of this would help brainstorming #10.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Considering that #10 is canceled in favor of #39, should this exist? Maybe not?
Maybe instead we should do something like bindl path NAME which returns the whole bin/.bindl/<hash>-NAME/NAME path?
bindl path NAME
bin/.bindl/<hash>-NAME/NAME
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
bindl exec NAME [args ...]
would:args
are passed directlySTDIN
STDOUT
STDERR
piping properly (relevant)The existence and implementation of this would help brainstorming #10.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: