Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A better (and shorter) class name than ConversionStringency #3

Open
heuermh opened this issue Sep 16, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

A better (and shorter) class name than ConversionStringency #3

heuermh opened this issue Sep 16, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@heuermh
Copy link
Member

heuermh commented Sep 16, 2016

No description provided.

@heuermh
Copy link
Member Author

heuermh commented Sep 21, 2017

ping @akmorrow13 @jpdna for any suggestions

@akmorrow13
Copy link
Contributor

akmorrow13 commented Sep 21, 2017

Is 'Conversion' too non informative? It would read nicely when using (Conversion.LENIENT, Conversion.isSilent)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants