You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be awesome to have a case-insensitive wildcard. Curious of the communities thoughts. On the surface, it doesn't seem like a tough implementation, though I'm not terribly confident in the syntax given that we were trying to avoid an ignore-case keyword...
we can change ignore-case to ignore-case-equals for the sake of consistency, but I have the similar performance concerns as mentioned in #72. I worry that this'll be diminishing returns.
For your use-case, are there any constraints on performance / match-time / rule compile time ? If so, we'd have to consider the effort tied to it (esp if you expect many wildcards to be use for a single key).
What is your idea?
It would be awesome to have a case-insensitive wildcard. Curious of the communities thoughts. On the surface, it doesn't seem like a tough implementation, though I'm not terribly confident in the syntax given that we were trying to avoid an
ignore-case
keyword...The above matches
stufff/cmd.exe -x
stuff/Cmd.exe -x
StUff/CmD.ExE
.Would you be willing to make the change?
Probably
Additional context
Add any other context (such as images, docs, posts) about the idea here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: