Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Visualize resource links better by focus on logical resource dependency's #421

Open
stijnvanrenterghem opened this issue Apr 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@stijnvanrenterghem
Copy link

stijnvanrenterghem commented Apr 20, 2023

Feature name
Visualize resource links better by focus on logical resource dependency's

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It is not easy to create a nice visual of a simple resource dependency.
For Example: Route53, IGW, CloudFront (++WAF), ALB, Listener, Target Groups, Server (Network Interface, Disk, ...)
Also an ALB Listener seems not to link with Target Groups.
For Example: Visualize network connectivity within the VPC for Servers.

Describe the feature you'd like to see implemented
See attached examples from other software products that realize nice overviews without any diagram change.
Have to possibility to group links. For example. Group connection from ALB to Subnets or to server.
I like the way a resource group expand and the other resources stay visible.

Describe the value this feature will add to AWS Perspective
Out of the box usable diagrams (Templates).
Less time to find problems in the architecture.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Other products.

Additional context
Please see below.

fugue.co
image

image

Hyperglance
image

image

image

image

@stijnvanrenterghem stijnvanrenterghem added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 20, 2023
@svozza
Copy link
Contributor

svozza commented Jun 1, 2023

This seems to me be be similar to #127, where we would have views with different granularities. This is definitely something we are interested in pursuing but obviously it involves a lot of redesign of the front end so we'd need to do a lot of planning to see how we would implement it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants