a question about using TAAHC or AAHC and a low average GEV

[zddzxxsmile]

Hello,

Dear authors, your work is really helpfull for me .

However, when I using TAAHC or AAHC methods (Matlab2019a I used), some errors happened as follows:

Error using *
Requested 106000x106000 (83.7GB) array exceeds maximum array size preference. Creation of arrays greater than this limit may take a long time and cause
MATLAB to become unresponsive. See array size limit or preference panel for more information.

Error in corr>corrPearson (line 299)
coef = x' * x; % 1/(n-1) doesn't matter, renormalizing anyway

Error in corr (line 206)
coef = corrFun(rows,tail,x);

Error in raahc (line 159)
cc = abs(corr(Xshuff)); % polarity invariant

Error in pop_micro_segment (line 250)
[EEG.microstate.Res.A_all, EEG.microstate.Res.L_all] = ...

Another question is that thought the GEV for the template is above 70%, but finally the average GEV is below 60%.

Thank you very much

[Yifan-wang830]

I am writing to inquire about an issue that you previously mentioned regarding the MST 1.0 toolbox. I am currently facing a similar problem and I am hoping that you could help me with it.

When I attempt to process data using the toolbox by TAAHC, I encounter an error message which reads
"cc = abs(corr(Xshuff)); % polarity invariant
double-type input parameters corresponding to the function 'corr' have not been defined. The error message is related to line 159 of the raahc script.

I am unsure how to resolve this issue and was wondering if you have found a solution to it. If so, would you be willing to share your insight with me? I would greatly appreciate any guidance or advice that you could provide on this matter.