Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

solarsystem.imcce: Cannot choose the dynamical model for the motion of satellites? #2992

Open
qing-xue opened this issue Apr 22, 2024 · 4 comments

Comments

@qing-xue
Copy link

astroquery.imcce/astroquery.solarsystem.imcce

Although users can choose the planetary theory such as 'INPOP', they cannot choose the dynamical model for the motion of satellites such as 'ura111'. Can this issue be solved in the future? Or are there other solutions?

@bsipocz
Copy link
Member

bsipocz commented Apr 22, 2024

cc @mkelley

@mkelley
Copy link
Contributor

mkelley commented Apr 22, 2024

@qing-xue Can you clarify the issue? I'm not very familiar with Mirade's ephemeris service and I don't see anything in the API documentation that correlates with the selection of dynamical models for satellites: https://ssp.imcce.fr/webservices/miriade//api/ephemcc/#webservice

If you see a way to get what you need through this API, but astroquery does not support it, please explain further so that we can fix that.

@qing-xue
Copy link
Author

Thank you. I find that there is another website of IMCCE service: http://nsdb.imcce.fr/multisat/nssreq7he.htm, in which the user can choose the theory for satellites as well as the planetary emphemerides. I'm not sure whether these two website are the same. Do you have any plans to support this website's API?

@mkelley
Copy link
Contributor

mkelley commented Apr 26, 2024

That appears to be a different service, and I am not aware of any desire to add this to astroquery. It may be best to contact the IMCCE about it and see what they recommend for your use case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants