Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make the Metadata fields templatable #1890

Open
9 tasks
phanikumv opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
9 tasks

make the Metadata fields templatable #1890

phanikumv opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
feature New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@phanikumv
Copy link
Collaborator

Please describe the feature you'd like to see
Refer to https://astronomer.slack.com/archives/C02B8SPT93K/p1680858815891099

Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen, if possible with code examples.

Are there any alternatives to this feature?
Is there another way we could solve this problem or enable this use-case?

Additional context
Add any other context about the feature request here.

Acceptance Criteria

  • All checks and tests in the CI should pass
  • Unit tests (90% code coverage or more, once available)
  • Integration tests (if the feature relates to a new database or external service)
  • Example DAG
  • Docstrings in reStructuredText for each of methods, classes, functions and module-level attributes (including Example DAG on how it should be used)
  • Exception handling in case of errors
  • Logging (are we exposing useful information to the user? e.g. source and destination)
  • Improve the documentation (README, Sphinx, and any other relevant)
  • How to use Guide for the feature (example)
@phanikumv phanikumv added the feature New feature or request label Apr 10, 2023
@tatiana tatiana added this to the 1.7.0 milestone May 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants