You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description
I would like to propose a feature that allows users to explicitly specify private package repositories for multiple packages within the rye package manager.
Proposed Configuration:
The configuration could be specified in the pyproject.toml file as follows:
[[tool.rye.sources]]
name = "source1"url = "https://company.internal/"
[[tool.rye.sources]]
name = "source2"url = "https://company2.internal/"
Proposed User Interface:
The command-line interface might look like this:
Or similar to Poetry --source option for add command.
Rationale:
This feature would provide developers with explicit control over package sources, rather than relying on internal resolution mechanisms. This can be particularly important for organizations that manage multiple private repositories and need precise control over which packages are pulled from which sources.
Thank you for considering this feature request. I believe it would greatly enhance the flexibility and usability of rye for many users.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
I would like to propose a feature that allows users to explicitly specify private package repositories for multiple packages within the rye package manager.
Proposed Configuration:
The configuration could be specified in the pyproject.toml file as follows:
Proposed User Interface:
The command-line interface might look like this:
This aligns with Conda's channel specification:
Or similar to Poetry
--source
option foradd
command.Rationale:
This feature would provide developers with explicit control over package sources, rather than relying on internal resolution mechanisms. This can be particularly important for organizations that manage multiple private repositories and need precise control over which packages are pulled from which sources.
Thank you for considering this feature request. I believe it would greatly enhance the flexibility and usability of rye for many users.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: