New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use KaTeX instead of MathJax #280
Comments
What I would recommend is making the switch and seeing what kind of feedback you get from users. If there are a lot of complaints about KaTeX, then you could consider making it an option, like We may want to agree on how this integrates into core, then do it here. |
AFAIK, KaTeX doesn't support AsciiMath, while MathJax does (at least MJ version 2 does support it). I don't know what you pick, but this extension is a very nice and pretty easy way to render a local asciidoc file. I don't know if you can cache MJ lib locally to address its size issue. Or if it comes with extension in the same bundle? But I would vote for universality vs other considerations. Thank you!!! |
It comes with the extension in the same bundle. |
I much prefer KaTeX to MathJax — I find it is faster and produces nicer-looking output. I'd be in favor of a |
MathJax is great but the rendering is a bit slow and the complete bundle size is roughly 5 Mb... As an alternative we could use KaTex: https://katex.org/docs/browser.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: