Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

allow multiple source location in gradle #67

Open
tbee opened this issue Dec 3, 2017 · 6 comments
Open

allow multiple source location in gradle #67

tbee opened this issue Dec 3, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@tbee
Copy link

tbee commented Dec 3, 2017

I use asciidoctlet in JFXtras and am very pleased with it. Recently Maven central required all jars to be accompanied with a source jar and javadoc jar. Beside the component jars, JFXtras also releases an all-in-one jar, which now requires a source and javadoc jar. I'm not very fluent in Gradle, but apparently asciidoctor cannot use multiple source locations so to generate one big javadoc. Is this easily added?

@johncarl81
Copy link
Member

I believe we're deploying the source and javadoc jars. For example: https://bintray.com/asciidoctor/maven/asciidoclet#files/org%2Fasciidoctor%2Fasciidoclet%2F1.5.6

@tbee
Copy link
Author

tbee commented Jul 14, 2018

The operative word here being "multiple".

@msgilligan
Copy link
Member

msgilligan commented Jul 14, 2018

Look at the ConsensusJ project (in gradle/javadoc.gradle) for an example...

@johncarl81
Copy link
Member

Correct me if I'm wrong @msgilligan... here's the configuration @tbee to collect all your project source javadocs together: https://github.com/ConsensusJ/consensusj/blob/master/gradle/javadoc.gradle#L49-L50

This is less of a doclet issue than a Javadoc thing.

@msgilligan
Copy link
Member

Yes, @johncarl81 it's a Gradle and Javadoc configuration issue, but ConsensusJ shows one way of doing it.

BTW, it's really cool to hear that https://github.com/JFXtras is using Asciidoclet!

@johncarl81 johncarl81 reopened this Jul 14, 2018
@johncarl81
Copy link
Member

@tbee, does this give you enough to go on?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants