Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Question: Can the geometry module and rigid_utils be converted to each other? #436

Open
wtni-gidle opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Question: Can the geometry module and rigid_utils be converted to each other? #436

wtni-gidle opened this issue Apr 30, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@wtni-gidle
Copy link

Thank you for your great work! I noticed that rigid_utils is used for monomers, while geometry is used for multimers in code implementation. Why was an extra module geometry created specifically for multimers? Can the Rotation and Rigid classes in rigid_utils be replaced by Rot3Array, Rigid3Array, and Vec3Array in geometry? In other words, can I replace rigid_utils with the geometry module after performing necessary tasks in the code?
@wtni-gidle wtni-gidle changed the title Question: Can the geometric module and rigid_utils be converted to each other? Question: Can the geometry module and rigid_utils be converted to each other? Apr 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@wtni-gidle