Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

feature: jackson dependencey was provided, compile is better #6287

Open
wt-better opened this issue Jan 23, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #6338
Open

feature: jackson dependencey was provided, compile is better #6287

wt-better opened this issue Jan 23, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #6338
Assignees
@Brian-b88
Labels
task: help-wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@wt-better
Copy link
Contributor

Why you need it?

seata at mode strong dependencey onjackson , but maven scope was provied.

Other related information

seata version: 2.0
@Brian-b88
Copy link

please assign to me

@xingfudeshi xingfudeshi added the task: help-wanted Extra attention is needed label Jan 31, 2024
@xingfudeshi
Copy link
Member

please assign to me

Hello, this issue has been assigned to you. Looking forward to your PR.

@slievrly
Copy link
Member

slievrly commented Feb 6, 2024

Long time no progress, I will fix this issue when I fix the dependency security vulnerability.

@slievrly slievrly linked a pull request Feb 6, 2024 that will close this issue
Open
1 task
@slievrly
Copy link
Member

slievrly commented Feb 6, 2024

jackson has a security vulnerability to upgrade but autoType has been disabled from version 2.10 and activateDefaultTyping is established by way of whitelist enumeration. However, in the case of saga, the user input type of the parser is not enumerable, and the loss of autoType capability may limit the interface/inheritance type support.

@linghengqian
Copy link
Member

  • If using a higher version of jackson will inevitably break the SAGA feature, this leads to another topic, can't we consider maven libraries that support the so-called autoType, such as fastjson?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Brian-b88 Brian-b88

Labels
task: help-wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

security: upgrade jackson version slievrly/fescar
5 participants
@slievrly @Brian-b88 @linghengqian @xingfudeshi @wt-better